đȘ WICKED PROBLEMSđȘ
What they are
A wicked problem is a complex issue with no clear solutionâone where every attempted fix reveals new challenges. These problems are unstable, interconnected, and full of contradictions. Think climate collapse, disinformation, democratic erosion, saving journalism, or trying to get a group of friends to agree on where to eat.
OK, maybe not the last one.
The Wicked Problem Construct (WPC) isnât just a way to define these challenges. Itâs a framework for managing them strategicallyâso we can act with more clarity and impact.
When to use it
Choose your own (mis)adventure:
Youâre an investigative journalism outlet who just lost a major grant, forcing layoffs and limiting your ability to cover critical issues. You canât afford to do business as usualâbut stopping isnât an option. The WPC helps you reassess your strategy, identify high-leverage investigations, and find new ways to collaborate, crowdfund, or decentralise your reporting to stay in the fight.
Youâre an human rights advocacy group that spent years securing legal protections for marginalized communitiesâonly to see the law repealed overnight. The old playbook wonât work anymore. Using the WPC, you shift from a legal-first strategy to a community mobilisation approach, building public pressure and leveraging international networks to challenge the rollback from multiple angles.
Youâre a grassroots election team working to boost community participationâbut every day, a flood of AI-generated misinformation is confusing and discouraging voters. Rather than playing whack-a-mole with falsehoods, you use the WPC to map the disinformation ecosystem, identify trusted local messengers, and create an adaptive response strategy that outpaces the chaos.
None of the above? No matter. If your work feels like you are constantly navigating contradictions instead of solving problems, this way of thinking is still for you.
Why use it
Itâs designed for real-world complexity. Many problem-solving frameworks assume rational actors, clear data, and linear progress. The WPC assumes chaos, power struggles, and uncertaintyâand helps you act anyway.
It stops you from wasting energy on âperfectâ solutions. Wicked problems donât have neat, permanent fixes. This approach focuses on adapting in real time instead.
It makes your strategy more resilient. Instead of rigid plans that fall apart when things change, this framework keeps you agile, adaptable, and proactive.
It helps you navigate conflict. Wicked problems often involve competing priorities. The WPC helps identify tensions before they become roadblocks.
And, without wanting to be mercenary about things, funders want to see that you understand the complexity of the problem you are addressing better than the other people looking for grants. Donât bring a knife to a drone war. (Or maybe do, but only if you can show why it's the best tool to cut the power cables).
How it works
A wicked problem canât be solved in a linear wayâit must be managed, disrupted, and outpaced. It works by constantly shifting, exploiting instability, and overwhelming opposition with chaos.Â
To counter it, you need to map the system to identify leverage points, adapt quickly as conditions change, and disrupt power structures rather than attacking everything at once. The key is to control the narrative, forcing the opposition into a reactive position, and to build decentralised networks that are resilient to attacks. Instead of trying to âfixâ the problem, you create friction, slow it down, and make it unworkableâbuying time for better strategies to emerge.
Take it to the next level
To see how to apply this thinking practically, letâs name a problem, one you are likely familiar with: Trumpâs Butterfly Revolution.
Trump's plan is following a step-by-step playbook to dismantle democracy and replace it with a CEO-stateâwhere power is centralised, opposition is silenced, and every system serves the leader. This isnât just rhetoric. Itâs a strategic, methodical approach to authoritarian control.
The Butterfly Revolution thrives on chaos, manipulation, and brute force. The resistance needs to understand its mechanics and disrupt it at every turn.
We can do that by understanding six kinds of uncertainty. Each reveals how Trump 2.0 systems operate and interact, allowing us to better understand (and resist) the type of problem we are tackling.
âš Uncertainty 1: Volatility (static to chaotic)
How much does the system change over time?
Trumpism feeds on chaos. It deliberately destabilizes institutionsâfiring bureaucrats en masse, rejecting court rulings, and flooding the news cycle with scandals. The goal? Flood the zone. Overwhelm opposition and make democratic norms feel obsolete.
The counter-strategy:
Stay adaptive. Traditional political responses (lawsuits, slow-moving advocacy) wonât keep pace. Build rapid-response networks that can react immediately to legal shifts, mass firings, and power grabs.
Control the tempo. Donât just respond to Trumpâs chaosâcreate your own moments that force them to react. Strategic leaks, surprise protests, and well-timed legal challenges can disrupt their momentum.
Prepare counter-narratives in advance. When they drop a bombshell (like refusing to comply with the courts), donât scrambleâhave messaging ready that frames it as proof of their weakness, not strength.
âš Uncertainty 2: Intricacy (simple to complicated)
How many interdependent parts are involved?
The Butterfly Revolution isnât just Trumpâitâs a web of PACs, media networks, dark money, and grassroots extremist movements. Disrupting one piece isnât enoughâyou need to see the whole picture.
The counter-strategy:
Map the ecosystem. Who funds them? Who spreads their messaging? What legal loopholes allow them to consolidate power? Follow the money, the media, and the law.
Attack weak points. A massive movement can still have fragile connections. Pressure donors, expose compliant politicians, and target internal fractures.
Create friction. If they want an efficient takeover, make it as complicated as possible. Lawsuits, FOIA requests, procedural delaysâevery bureaucratic hurdle slows them down.
âš Uncertainty 3: Modularity (tightly integrated to loosely coupled)
How easily can the systemâs parts be changed?
Trumpâs takeover is both centralised and modular. That makes it tricky. He wants a federalised police force, a fully loyal bureaucracy, and total control over courtsâbut his movement also relies on decentralised extremist groups and unpredictable media allies.
The counter-strategy:
Exploit their rigidity. If they centralise law enforcement, focus on local resistanceâcities and states can refuse cooperation.
Co-opt their modularity. If they rely on a loose coalition of influencers, media, and billionaire backers, pit them against each other. Highlight contradictions, fuel infighting, and isolate their most extreme factions.
Build your own flexible networks. Authoritarians love centralized controlâmovements that are nimble and decentralized are harder to crush.
âš Uncertainty 4: Scalability (sublinear to superlinear growth)
How does the system respond to scale?
Trumpâs movement scales like an insurgency. His ideas spread exponentially through social media and right-wing ecosystems. A single message on X can mobilise millions overnightâwhereas democratic institutions can only scale and react slowly and bureaucratically.
The counter-strategy:
Leverage superlinear tactics. Trumpâs machine thrives on viral rageâcounter it with viral defiance. Expose contradictions, use humor to discredit them, and spread decentralised resistance strategies.
Donât fight them on their timeline. Trump wants his base constantly mobilised while his opponents burn out. Pace yourself.
Create flashpoints of engagement. Instead of broad, ongoing campaigns, design targeted, high-impact moments that force the media cycle to focus on your message. Remember: you canât post your way out of fascism.
âš Uncertainty 5: Ambiguity (from lucid to fuzzy)
How clearly defined are the systemâs boundaries?
Trumpism deliberately blurs reality. Laws become suggestions. Rules apply selectively. Even their own supporters arenât sure which promises are real and which are propaganda.
The counter-strategy:
Define clear battle lines. Make sure the public understands: This isnât normal. This isnât legal. This isnât democracy.
Expose their contradictions. Trumpism thrives on shapeshifting rhetoricâone day theyâre anti-elite, the next theyâre demanding absolute loyalty to the most elite figure of all. Force them to pick a lane.
Own the language war. Words shape reality. If they call it âelection security,â call it âvoter suppression.â If they call it âderegulation,â call it âcorporate control.â
âš Uncertainty 6: Reflexivity (from isolated to immersed)
How much does the system change based on how itâs perceived?
The Butterfly Revolution isnât just about powerâitâs about perception. If Trumpâs movement is seen as inevitable, strong, and disciplined, it becomes that. If itâs seen as incompetent, infighting, and ridiculous, it weakens.
The counter-strategy:
Control the frame. Every authoritarian movement wants to look unstoppable. Show their failures, their incompetence, their fear.
Disrupt their aesthetic. Strongmen project powerâhumiliate them, mock them, expose their insecurities.
Flood the zone with reality. When they spread disinformation, donât just debunkâreplace. Shift the focus to real stories of their corruption and harm.